This single clause can change your exit outcome by millions. Do not gloss over it.
The Good: 1x Non-Participating Preferred
This is the industry standard. It gives the investor a choice: take their original investment back (downside protection) OR convert to common stock and share the proceeds according to ownership % (upside participation). They cannot do both.
The Bad: Participating Preferred
This is “double dipping.” The investor gets their money back first AND then participates in the remaining proceeds as if they hadn't been paid back. In a modest exit, this structure can leave founders with significantly reduced returns. Never sign this at the Seed stage.
The most common “gotcha” in term sheets is the Option Pool Shuffle. Investors often insist on a 20% option pool calculated on the pre-money valuation. This sounds technical, but it is financially brutal.
Sample Math: The Cost of a 20% PoolLet's assume a $2M investment on an $8M Pre-Money valuation ($10M Post-Money).
- Scenario A (20% Pool from Pre-Money): The investor wants a 20% pool ($2M value) carved out of your equity. Your effective pre-money valuation drops from $8M to $6M. You own 60% of the company.
- Scenario B (10% Pool from Pre-Money): You negotiate the pool down to 10% ($1M value) based on a concrete hiring plan. Your effective pre-money valuation is $7M. You own 70% of the company.
Impact: Negotiating the pool from 20% to 10% saved you 10% of the company. On a $100M exit, that is a $10M difference. See this
breakdown of the shuffle for a deeper dive.
A clean term sheet prevents you from losing your company, but it doesn't generate revenue. Use these questions to block toxic terms like Participating Preferred, then sign and get back to building. Your real leverage isn't legal arguments — it's hitting
Design Partner Agreements that convert to $10k+ MRR.